|
A Kolkata court has admitted a petition challenging the depiction of
Shri Amartya Sen as a
Nobel Prize winner. The petitioner, Shri Subidh
Chandra Roy, has filed a case of cheating against the publisher of the
translated book 'Unnayan O Swakhamata'
(Development as Freedom).
Shri Roy has argued that Shri Amartya Sen did not win the Nobel Prize. He won a prize called
'The Bank of Sweden Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel'.
This prize is different from the Nobel Prizes and was started only in
1968. The publishers are allegedly depicting him as a Nobel Prize winner in
order to increase sales.
What is the truth? Truth, presently, is sub-judice.
But you can visit the Nobel Prize site yourself and make up your own
mind about it. The links are given below.
[References:
"Court admits Amartya's
Nobel authenticity case", 25-Nov-04, p. 1. Hindustan Times - NEXT, New
Delhi
http://nobelprize.org/
http://nobelprize.org/economics/]
Communist parties often criticise religious
intolerance. But their own intolerance for all religious
behavior is not so well known.
In a move that is designed to generate controversy, the Communist
parties have now proposed taxing all religious institutions.
The tax is to take the form of a cess and
will be used to fund rural development.
Once the precedent to tax religious charity is set, how long will it
be before charity itself is taxed?
Also proposed is a tax on private schools, nursing homes and
hospitals.
[References:
"Left wants cess
on holy houses", 4-Nov-04, Hindustan Times, New Delhi]
The Delhi Police has arrested one person from Delhi for swindling
lakhs of rupees by using a fake franking machine. The person was working as a
mailing contractor for several organisations, including a public limited
company.
The fraud came to light accidentally. One of the Post Office staff
became suspicious about a letter, which had been franked. On checking, it was
found to be done with a fake machine. The Post Office staff then discovered
about 42,000 letters franked in the same way.
On contacting the concerned company, they directed the police to their
mailing contractor. He confessed to the fraud. The original machine issued by
the Post Office was lying unused in one corner.
Moral of the story? Check carefully before you hand over your mass
mailing to an outside contractor. Also, if you are using a franking machine
in your office, make sure that your payment procedures are foolproof.
[References:
'Nakli daak tikat ghotala
pakda', 11-Oct-04, Dainik
Jagran, New Delhi]
The Indian Stamp Act has been amended. The cut-off limit for revenue
stamps on receipts has been revised.
You now need to fix a revenue stamp only where the amount received
exceeds Rs.5,000.
The value of the stamp remains unchanged at Re.1.
This change has become effective from 10th September 2004.
[References:
Schedule 1, Article 53, The Indian Stamp Act,
1999.
Finance Act, 2004]
In February 2000, a writ was filed in Delhi High court. The writ
prayed that CAG should probe how BCCI spends its money. Later the Central
Government also became a party to the case.
BCCI argued that it was a private club. It was neither the state nor
an instrument of the state. Therefore, the petition was not maintainable.
The Court has passed an order on this. It has said that BCCI's affairs
can be scrutinised by the judiciary. That is so
because BCCI has a public function also. It is these public functions that
can be scrutinised.
Technically speaking, BCCI is an 'NGO'. Therefore, this ruling has
significant implications for NGOs also. Most NGOs have a public function. If
this precedent is followed, then people can bring writ petitions against NGOs
they don't like. They can ask for judicial scrutiny or how an NGO spends its
money.
[References:
BCCI: Board of Cricket Control in India
"BCCI's business is your business too",
Hindustan Times, 5-Oct-04
"HC tells BCCI its affairs liable to
judicial scrutiny", Pioneer, 5-Oct-04
See also AccountAid Capsule 157 and 159 at
www.AccountAid.net]
Does BCCI have FCRA? No.
Then how is it able to accept so much foreign funds?
Simple. BCCI has been formed for promotion of sports. Sports is not covered by section 6 of FCRA. This section
applies only to NGOs with a cultural, economic, educational, religious or
social program.
[References:
Section 6(1)(a) of Foreign Contribution
(Regulation) Act, 1976
www1.cricket.indiatimes.com/articleshow/851406.cms
See also AccountAid Capsule 157 at
www.AccountAid.net]
Do you operate your bank account on the internet? If yes, then you may
be vulnerable to the following fraud:
You receive an e-mail message on your bank's stationery. It says that
the bank is updating its customer database or revalidating its software. Or
there may be some other similar excuse. It then asks you to log on to your
bank account by clicking on a link contained in the message.
What should you do? Nothing. Just delete the message.
Because if you click on the link, it will take you to a dummy address
and form. When you fill up the form with your log in information, the
information will be stolen.
These people will then use the information to log on to your account.
They will then very kindly relieve you of the money in your bank account.
They might later send you a thanks message, but well, don't bank on
it.
Can you name the richest non-profit organisation in India? It has Rs.
181 crores in bank deposits, and earned Rs. 73 crores last year (2003-04)?
It is in the public eye most of the time. Its employees are some of
the highest paid individuals in India. They also spend a lot of their time
out of India. You also know most of them by name.
Got it? It is none other than Board of Cricket Control in India.
Surprised? Well, it is registered as a society under the Tamil Nadu
Societies Registration Act, 1975.
[References:
www1.cricket.indiatimes.com/articleshow/851406.cms]
Saudi Arabia plans to dismantle all international charities operating
in the kingdom. Their investments and other assets will be placed under a new
commission. According to the Saudi and US authorities, this will stop the
flow of their funds to terror groups.
The charities to be dissolved include Al Haramain
Islamic Foundation, which was raising as much as 50 million US dollars at the
peak of its operations.
Five of the Al Haramain offices
(Afghanistan, Albania, Bangladesh, Ethiopia and Netherlands) have been
designated as "terror financiers".
The new commission will be called "The Saudi National Commission
for Relief and Charity Work Abroad". It will be responsible for
disbursing about 100 million US Dollars () annually.
How much is that in Indian rupees: just 4.50 arab
rupees or 10% of the annual flow of FCRA funds to India.
[References:
"Saudi Arabia plans to dissolve charities to
block terror funding", p. 7, Indian Express, N. Delhi, 4-June-2004]
Last year saw a severe drought in West Rajasthan. To prevent the
villagers from selling off their cattle during the drought, the State
Government helped arrange fodder for the cattle. This massive effort, which
was much appreciated, was oragnised with the help
of local NGOs and charitable organisations.
According to a newspaper report, clever truck owners and local
middlemen may have siphoned off some of the money for the transportation
grant. How? During verification of weighbridge slips, it was found that the
fodder was not purchased from one place, and the supporting documents were
obtained from another place.
The District Administration has rejected claims aggregating Rs.13
lakhs so far. The reporter fears that this may just be the tip of the
iceberg.
The claims rejected include:
1. Prani Mitra Sansthan, Barmer: Rs.8 lakh
2. Manav Seva Sangh, Barmer: Rs.1.50 lakh
3. Bhansali Trust, Barmer:
Rs.1.25 lakh
4. Zilla Gau Seva Samiti, Barmer: Rs.50,000
The concerned NGOs have stated that they purchased the fodder from
truck drivers. They were in no position to verify where the truck owners were
getting the fodder from.
[References:
"Barmer mein karodon ka parivahan anudan ghotala", P.9, Rajasthan Patrika,
Jaipur, 6-Mar-04]
According to the same report, 60% of the funds go to religious
organisations, mainly Christian.
Is this true? It is difficult to say.
Our analysis of the top 25 receivers shows that:
·
They received Rs.1,097 crores in 2001-02.
·
Of this, as much as 79% of the funds were
received by organisations with religious linkages.
·
The balance 21% was received by organisations
which do not have any religious linkages.
[References:
Please note that funds received by a religious
organisation may be spent for secular purposes. - Ed.
"NGO ko videshi madad aage rajya sarkar
ke niyantran mein", P.3, Rajasthan Patrika,
Jaipur, 2-Mar-04]
According to Shri Praveen Shrivastava,
Secretary, FCRA Department at Delhi, they receive many reports of cheating
related to FCRA every year.
Although they seal dozens of NGO accounts each year, it is difficult for
them to monitor the work of all the NGOs with just 20-25 staff in the FCRA
Department. The District Authorities will find it easier to monitor the work.
[References:
"NGO ko videshi madad aage rajya sarkar
ke niyantran mein", P.3, Rajasthan Patrika,
Jaipur, 2-Mar-04
AccountAid Capsules 10, 65, 151 at
www.AccountAid.net]
According to a news report, the Central Government is planning to pass
the new FCRA law, called Foreign Contribution Management Act, soon.
The final draft is awaiting cabinet approval. It has been finalised after several meetings between NGOs, the Home
Minister and the Law Minister.
Under the new Act, the District Authorities will have a say in the
kind of foreign assistance that is accepted.
[References:
"NGO ko videshi madad aage rajya sarkar
ke niyantran mein", P.3, Rajasthan Patrika,
Jaipur, 2-Mar-04
AccountAid Capsules 10, 65 at www.AccountAid.net]
The UN organisations and many other international agencies have been
exempt from FCRA restrictions for quite some time.
This means that an NGO without FCRA may receive funds from one of
these.
The new guidelines make a strange sideswipe at these exempt funds.
Para 9 of the guidelines says:
"Bilateral and Multilateral Partners that are exempt under
section 2(1)(e)(ii) of the FC(R) Act, 1976, may also
restrict their assistance to organisations that are registered under the Act
or are permitted to receive assistance under the Act."
Does this mean that UN funds are now being restricted to FCRA
registered NGOs only?
[References:
See also AccountAid Capsule 135, 148, 149, 150
and AccountAble 40 at www.AccountAid.net
Ministry of Finance & Company Affairs Press
release dated 2-Jun-03; Guidelines for Future Development Cooperation with
Bilateral Partners, dated 12-Sep-03]
·
Do the guidelines apply to all grants coming out
of an Embassy's office?
No. These apply only to grants made to NGOs out of the bilateral
assistance. These do not apply to grants made by the Embassy out of other,
non-bilateral funds.
·
Do these guidelines apply to grants from
international donor agencies?
No. These do not apply to non-bilateral agencies at all.
[References:
See also AccountAid Capsule 135, 148, 149 at
www.AccountAid.net
Ministry of Finance & Company Affairs Press
release dated 2-Jun-03; Guidelines for Future Development Cooperation with
Bilateral Partners, dated 12-Sep-03]
What do the guidelines say?
·
Bilateral assistance from the other countries can
now be transferred directly to Indian NGOs (para
7).
·
However, autonomous bodies, which are largely
funded by the Government of India, can not accept
these funds.
·
The donors will have to follow a procedure for
transfer of bilateral assistance to NGOs.
·
They should submit a list of the NGOs to be
funded twice a year to the Department of Economic Affairs (DEA). A profroma has been given in the guidelines for this.
·
These NGOs should have FCRA registration or get
prior-permission.
·
DEA may make suggestions for modifications. The
concerned donor is expected to consider these and modify the list.
·
Monitoring will be done directly by the concerned
donor agency.
[References:
See also AccountAid Capsule 135, 148 at
www.AccountAid.net
Ministry of Finance & Company Affairs Press
release dated 2-Jun-03; Guidelines for Future Development Cooperation with
Bilateral Partners, dated 12-Sep-03]
Last year in March 2003, the Government of India announced that it
would no longer accept bilateral assistance from donor countries with
'smaller aid packages'.
In June 2003, it announced that only six bilateral donors could
continue to work with Indian government. These are Japan, UK, Germany, USA,
EC and the Russian Federation.
In September 2003, it announced some guidelines for bilateral
assistance cooperation. These guidelines do not apply to bilateral assistance
from the above six donors.
[References:
'Bilateral assistance' means aid or loan transfer
from one nation's Government to another nation's Government.
See also AccountAid Capsule 135 at
www.AccountAid.net
Ministry of Finance & Company Affairs Press
release dated 2-Jun-03; Guidelines for Future Development Cooperation with
Bilateral Partners, dated 12-Sep-03]
According to a news report in Pioneer:
·
A senior Catholic priest wanted funds for an
awareness campaign in Palamau district, near
Ranchi. He asked for money from the Jesuit Society and other sister concerns
of missionaries. However, they refused as accounts for an earlier installment
of Rs.14 lakhs were still pending.
·
So he turned to his followers in the church.
After church prayers, they were asked to invest money in a Mumbai-based
organisation called Trust India Concept. Some 20,000 persons found the scheme
attractive enough to invest Rs.20 crores!
·
Initially the investors got the monthly
installments regularly. Later the scheme started floundering. The investors
then started raising a hue and cry.
·
Currently, Father Dharamsheel
Kujur and two of his assistants are confined to the
Manresa House office of the Jesuit Society. The police are investigating.
[References:
For more details see, 'Ranchi priest lured
followers to invest money', The Pioneer, Delhi, 25-Feb-04, P.8; also at
http://www.dailypioneer.com
'India news: Priest charged with swindling public
money', Keralanext;
http://www.keralanext.com/news/index.asp?id=27510]
Tehelka is back as a weekly newspaper. The
inaugural issue carries a cover story alleging that the US government is
collaborating with missionaries and church groups to promote religious
conversion in India.
The story, spanning across two issues of Tehelka,
describes the methodology, the sources of funding and names some of the
organisations that are allegedly involved in the evangelisation
drive.
One of the key ideas of the story is that funds for religious
activities are being brought into India by church-based organisations under
the cover of HIV/ Aids work.
The newspaper goes on to allege that the Indian Government is not
doing much to prevent this drive, which may lead to more rifts in the Indian
society.
The news-story is likely to have major implications in the long run
for the proposed FCMA bill, and the way foreign contributions are accounted
and managed.
Bush Administration's move to fund religious organisations has also
met with some criticism in USA itself.
[References:
1. Tehelka, New Delhi,
7-Feb-2004: "Preparing for the
harvest...", p.6; "Jesus
comes to Karla", p.10;
"Those that shall
deliver", p.13; "A private
faith made dangerously public", p. 18
2. Tehelka, New Delhi,
14-Feb-2004: "Saving lives,
harvesting souls", p.32
3. www.tehelka.com
4. www.constitutionparty.com/
Bushs_faith_based_fascism.htm
5.
christianity.about.com/library/weekly/aa013001.htm
6. www.mcjonline.com/news/01a/20010202a.shtml
See also AccountAid capsules 9 and 33]
An organisation in Netherlands has come up with a novel idea on
fund-raising. It has launched 'currency' notes called Raam
NL. NL stands for Netherlands. Raam stands for Shri
Ram Chandra who is worshipped by Hindus as an avatar of Shri Vishnu ji.
The organisation is a part of Maharishi Mahesh Yogi's group. The
currency is fully backed by equivalent Euro deposits in the Fortis bank. Each
Raam NL is worth 10 Euro or about Rs.580.
About 167 shops in 45 Dutch cities and villages have started accepting
the currency. The Dutch Central Bank has clarified that there is no violation
of Dutch laws so long as the 'currency' is not presented as legal tender.
According to BBC, the Raam is also
circulating as a currency in Maharishi Vedic City, Iowa, USA.
[References:
"[Shri] Raam goes
Dutch", P.54, India Today, New Delhi, 6-Oct-03
"Maharishi's 'raam'
wins" The Telegraph, Calcutta, 5-Feb-2003
"Dutch give nod to 'guru currency'",
BBC News. 5-Feb-2003 at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/2730121.stm
Raam
- The Global Development Currency at
http://www.globalcountry.org/EasyWeb.asp?pcpid=1521
Prospectus dated 16-Oct-2003 at
www.poverty-removal.org/images/Prospectus_2003-3.pdf
The notes also carry an image of Shri Ram, with a
European complexion. According to established Hindu tradition, both Shri Ram and Shri Krishna (as well as Arjun) are known as being dark-skinned. An innocent mistake, or natural racial bias? - Ed. ]
|