|
(26-Dec-05)
Contd. from 188…
However, not all endowments are as big. Georgia
Perimeter College had just $370,000 (Rs.1.7 crores)
in June 2004. Still, the average size of each institution’s endowment is failry big: $360,651,000 (Rs.16.60 arabs).
741 institutions participated in the survey.
The University endowments in USA have also come in for
some criticism. Most tend to spend only 5% of their asset base each year.
This was meant to be the minimum spending requirement. However, in effect, it
is being seen by the Universities as the maximum spending limit!
What is the nature of this criticism?
Historically, the endowments have been earning around
10-11%each year. Out of this they spend 5%. Another 3% can be said to be used
to cover inflation. That still leves another 2-3%,
which could be spent safely, without hurting the endowment. If this was to
happen, then possibly the tuition fee could be cut to half at some of the
Universities.
[References:
Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financial_endowment
‘So Nicely Endowed!’ Newsweek: Kaplan
College Guide, Arian Campo-Flores, http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5626570/site/newsweek/
National Association of College and Universities
Business Officers: 2004 NACUBO Endowment Study: http://www.nacubo.org/x2376.xml]
(26-Dec-05)
The US economy is the biggest in the world. Giving in
USA also tends to be appropriately big. Take for instance enowment
funds that American Universities have.
Some of the richer ones each have endowments, which may
add up to a billion dollars or more (Rs.45 arabs).
For example, Harvard has more than 9400 separate
endowments. These added up to more than $22 billion (Rs.10.18 kharabs) as of June 2004.
In an earlier year (2003), its return on the
investments came to 12.5%. It then spent 5% of the total endowment ($770
million, Rs.35.42 arabs) during the year, per tax
requirements. Of course, this was only a small part of its total budget ($2.4
billion, Rs.1.10 kharabs)!
Contd. in 189…
[References:
Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financial_endowment
‘So Nicely Endowed!’ Newsweek: Kaplan
College Guide, Arian Campo-Flores, http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5626570/site/newsweek/
National Association of College and Universities
Business Officers: 2004 NACUBO Endowment Study: http://www.nacubo.org/x2376.xml]
(23-Dec-05)
An article in The Economist has described how
some churches in USA are reinventing themselves by applying sound business
practices to church activities. The article also provides some glimpses into
American religious giving. For example:
·
Lakewood Church in Houston had an income of $
55,000,000 in 2004. Translated into Indian figures, this comes to Rs.2.58 arabs. This is one out of 1000
churches in USA, which are counted as mega-churches. Broadly speaking, you
qualify as a mega-church if 2,000 or more people attend.
·
The Fellowship Church in Grapevine, Texas, has
an annual budget of $30,000,000 (Rs.1.38 arabs). It spends 15% of its budget (Rs.21 crores) on technology.
·
Willow Creek Association, the consulting arm
of the Willow Creek Church, offers advice to 11,500 member churches. It earns
$ 20,000,000 (Rs.92 crores) a year from this.
·
Mr. Creflo Dollar,
chief pastor of World Changers Church International in Georgia, drives a
Rolls Royce and travels in a private Gulfstream jet.
·
Ms. Joyce Meyers, often seen on GOD TV, owns a
house worth $2,000,000 (Rs.9.20 crores). She also
owns private jet worth $10,000,000 (Rs.46 crores).
[References:
‘Jesus, CEO: America’s most successful
churches are modeling themselves on businesses’ , The Economist, London,
p. 51, 24-December 2005
While all 501(c)(3) charities in USA are required
to disclose their finances to public, churches (including non-Christian
religious organizations) are exempt from this requirement. Therefore,
relatively little is known about religious giving and spending in USA. – Ed.]
186: Shree Venkateswara’s Diamond Headband
(23-Dec-05)
On Thursday night, a devotee offered a bejewelled headband to Bhagwan
Shree Venkateswar at Thirupati.
The diamond-studded band, valued at Rs.1.4 crores
(~$300,000), was received by Shri APVN Sharma, officer of the Thirumala Thirupati Devasthanam Trust.
Now two questions arise:
1. Can the unnamed devotee claim this as a deduction
from his / her income tax?
2. How will the gift be valued and accounted in the
Trust’s books?
Well, the devotee can not
claim it as a deduction under section 80G. Reason is that Income Tax Act in
India does not recognize donations in kind as donations at all.
With regard to accounting, the situation is equally
peculiar. The ICAI has not released any accounting standards for charitable
or religious organizations. As a result, most people try to apply the
standards issued for commercial organizations in such situations. The result?
A gift valued at Rs.1.4 crore will probably be
accounted in the Trust books at Rupee 1.
[References:
‘Bhagwan Venkateswar ko 1.4 karod ke jewar
arpit’, Dainik Jagran, New Delhi, p. 11, 23-December 2005
Accounting Standards 10 and 12, issued by the
Institute of Chartered Accountants of India]
(15-Dec-05)
Recently, the Delhi High Court has said that prima-facie, trust property can not be
sold, mortgaged or exchanged without prior-permission of court.
The observation was made by Justice Vikramjit
Sen in a matter relating to sale of some land by Sarvadeshik Arya Pratinidhi Sabha to Shri Ashok Mehra.
The case is presently being heard and a final order is
expected in due course.
It may be noted that in some states such as Tamilnadu, Maharashtra and Gujarat, official permission
is required under law for a charity to alienate or mortgage land etc.
[References:
'Trust can't sell assets wihtout
permission', Hindustan Times, New Delhi, p. 4, 12-December 2005]
(13-Dec-05)
NGOs in Maharashtra are quite familiar with the term cess. They have been paying 2% of their income every year
to the Charities Commissioner. Tax-payers also know about the 2% education cess introduced last year. This yields about 80 arabs annually. There has also been some talk of a health
cess, in addition to the education cess. Why all these cesses,
when the Government already collects, income tax, VAT, Service tax, road tax,
etc.
Well, a cess is levied on a
limited number of users, who benefit from a particular service. A key feature
is that the money can not be spent on general
objects. It should be spent on specific purposes.
Now the Delhi Government is planning to introduce a 1% cess on the building industry. This will be added to the
cost of a building and ultimately recovered from the buyers. The cess will be used to provide insurance and other benefits
to construction workers.
This is a strikingly ambitious scheme. Construction
workers often migrate from one place to another and from one trade to another.
Administering the scheme would probably be quite a challenge. In the past,
Government has found it difficult to administer schemes such as Provident
Fund, ESI, etc., where the odds are not so high.
Let us then hope and pray that this cess
also does not turn into a cess-pool.
[References:
Capsule 182: Education Cess
and Right to Education
1 arab = 100 crores = 1 billion
'Social Security for workers', Hindustan Times,
New Delhi, 30-November 2005]
(26-Nov-05)
We had earlier reported how Russia is one of 23
countries, which place legal restrictions on foreign funding of elections. In
this, Russia was among illustrious company, notably that of UK, USA, France,
Germany, Japan, Canada, and Spain.
India also imposes such a ban through FCRA, which is
all set to be strengthened further with a new bill called FCMC. However, the
Indian legislation is different in that FCRA also monitors funding of NGOs,
in order to ensure that foreign funds are not used for political activities.
India's neighbors, such as Pakistan and Bangladesh, also exercise some form
of control over NGOs.
Now Russia is also planning to extend similar controls
over private charities, which may be supporting political activities. This
has led to protests by the affected groups and some uncharitable headlines in
the Western press.
What provisions does the bill contain? Details are not
available, but some of the key provisions include the following:
1. Foreign organisations would need to register in
Russia as Russian organisations. They would not be allowed to register as
branch offices or representative offices.
2. Such organisations should be governed by Russians or
by foreigners living permanently in Russia. This would give Russian
authorities legal jurisdiction over them.
3. It may become more difficult for them to receive
foreign funding.
4. The State Commission would have powers to
investigate them and shut them down if found justified.
[References:
FCRA: Foreign Contribution Regulation Act, 1976
FCMC: Foreign Contribution Management and Control
Bill
"Kremlin out to stifle NGOs, charities - New
law aims to restrict foreign support
for political activity; Greenpeace, Amnesty affected", p. 25, Times of
India / Times International, New Delhi, 25-Nov-2005
"Nationalists take aim at NGOs 'plotting' to
destabilise Russia" Neil Buckley, FT.Com,
Published: November 26 2005
http://news.ft.com/cms/s/9c9dc506-5e42-11da-a9e8-0000779e2340.html]
(19-Nov-05)
Presently, the Government spends about Rs.470 arabs annually on elementary education. After the Right
to Education Bill is passed, this will probably double to Rs.1000 arabs. Where will the Government get the extra money for
this?
The Government has introduced education cess of 2% last year. However, annual collections are
coming to just about Rs.80 arabs. So the Government
is likely to either borrow money or raise taxes further.
Incidentally, 6% of GDP, planned to be spent on education,
comes to around Rs.1700 arabs. If that target is to
be reached, then the Government has to either cut expenditure on other heads
or raise taxes even more.
Service tax is a likely candidate for further increase.
In some Scandnavian countries, service tax is as
high as 25%. This is surely serving as a beacon to the Finance Ministry.
[References:
An arab (100,00,00,000) is equal to 100 crores
or 1 billion.
"Right to Education may tax you more",
p. 19, Economic Times, New Delhi, 14-Nov-2005]
(18-Nov-05)
If Economic Times is to be believed, then NGOs may also
be soon be paying service tax. This may be done next
year by removing the present requirement that the service provider be a
'commercial concern'.
A small beginning in this direction has already been
made in 2005 by bringing in clauses 25A and zzze.
However, an exception is provided for activities 'which are in the nature of
a public service and are of a charitable, religious or political nature'.
[References:
Section 65 (25A), Chapter V and VA of the Finance
Act, 1994, as amended by the Finance Act, 2005
Section 65 (105) (zzze),
Chapter V and VA of the Finance Act, 1994, as amended by the Finance Act,
2005
"Service tax likely on charitable societies
and non-profit cos", p. 1, Economic Times, New
Delhi, 14-Nov-2005]
(17-Nov-05)
In June 2005, service tax was introduced on fees and
subscriptions collected by clubs and associations from its members. Does this
mean that NGOs have to pay service tax on dues collected from their members?
No. This applies only where the members receive
services, facilities or advantages against the dues paid.
This means tax would be due from clubs such as Delhi
Golf Club, Gymkhana Clubs, etc. Resident Welfare Societies collecting
security charges etc. could also end up paying service tax. However, this is
applicable only when their turnover exceeds Rs. 4 lakhs (400,000) per year.
[References:
Section 65 (25A), Chapter V and VA of the Finance
Act, 1994, as amended by the Finance Act, 2005
Section 65 (105) (zzze),
Chapter V and VA of the Finance Act, 1994, as amended by the Finance Act,
2005]
(16-Nov-05)
The Escorts Hospital (EHIRC) was set up in Delhi a
couple of decades ago as a charitable trust by the Escorts group of
companies. The hospital specialized in heart care and bypass surgery. It soon
developed an excellent reputation. People stopped going to USA for their
heart bypass operations.
About three years ago, EHIRC was converted from a
charitable trust to a non-charitable trust and then later to a company. The
hospital was then sold to Fortis Healthcare, a company of the Ranbaxy group.
Considering its goodwill and the value of real-estate, it must been an
immensely valuable deal for the both the parties.
One of the trustees of EHIRC took the matter to court.
The Minister of Finance also made a statement saying that such misuse of
charity law would not be permitted. DDA also tried to intervene in the matter
saying that the deal violated conditions of allotment of the land at
concessional prices.
Fortis has recently made a statement to clear the air,
saying that no law has been violated, and that DDA consent is not required.
There have been several other cases across India where
charitable hospitals have been taken over by upcoming Medicare chains. Escorts has drawn more attention because it is a
well-known hospital and a pioneer in heart-surgery.
These takeovers point to a general trend where powerful
corporate groups are changing the shape and structure of medical care in the
country. This may be partly due to emergence of a rich class of patients who
demand and expect attention and courtesy during hospitalization and are willing
to pay for it. Another reason could be the growing popularity of medical
insurance policies, where the patient doesn't have to foot the bill and
doesn't care if he/she is charged more.
Irrespective of what happens in the Escorts case, it is
likely that this deal will have far-reaching implications for the NGO sector.
The case may lead to further tightening of charity law and erosion of other
privileges to charitable organisations.
[References:
EHIRC: Escorts Heart Institute and Research
Centre
DDA: Delhi Development Authority
"Fortis says DDA consent not required",
p. 5, Hindustan Times, Delhi, 16-nov-2005]
(29-Sep-05)
The NGO sector has been requesting the Government to
shift the FCRA Department out of the Ministry of Home Affairs. So far the
Government has not agreed. However, the Department has shifted its office
away from Khan Market.
The new address is:
Ministry of Home Affairs, Foreign Division (FCRA)
Jaisalmer House,
26, Maan Singh Road
New Delhi –110 011
Ph: 011- 2338 3075, 2469 8009
[References:
FCRA: Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 1976
]
(7-July-05)
On 24th June, the MHA and ICAI organised a workshop at
Delhi on FCRA and money-laundering. At this workshop, it was also announced
that the Government is planning to replace the FCRA with a new law.
The proposed bill is now available at www.AccountAid.net. It is called the
Foreign Contribution (Management and Control) Bill, 2005. It proposes
far-reaching changes in the FCRA.
[References:
MHA: Ministry of Home Affairs; http://mha.nic.in/fore.htm; Also see http://mha.nic.in/fcmc-bill-05.pdf
for a copy of the bill.
ICAI: Institute of Chartered Accountants of
India; www.icai.org ]
(7-June-05)
The ICAI has recently come out with a useful
publication on FCRA. It is titled 'A Study on Foreign Contribution
(Regulation) Act 1976.
The booklet explains the basic provisions of FCRA and
contains some useful practice notes for Chartered Accountants. It also covers
some frequently asked questions. The FCRA Act and Rules are also included
though without the forms.
Some of views contained in the book need to be
carefully assessed before taking any important steps. These include views on
transactions between FCRA and local funds (pages 5, 64), and multiple bank
accounts (pages 10, 63) for FCRA funds.
Containing 129 pages, the booklet is priced at Rs.100
and is available from ICAI sale counters.
[References:
ICAI: Institute of Chartered Accountants of
India; www.icai.org ]
(17-May-05)
According to a news report, the MPLAD limit may now go
up to Rs.3 crores, from the present Rs.2 crores. The MPs have been asking for the limit to be
raised to Rs.5 crores.
Two important features of the revised scheme may be
that firstly, a certain percentage may have to be spent on drinking water,
roads, education, electricity, etc.
Secondly, the MPs may be allowed to spend the money
through private institutions, trusts etc. The MPs have been raising this
demand for quite some time. Initially, there may be a limit of Rs.5 lakhs on
this.
Why do the MPs want to spend this money through the
NGOs? Well, for one thing, the NGOs are much better equipped for this and
possibly closer to the people. Secondly, it is easier to work with NGOs, as
there is lesser paperwork. Thirdly, the accounting is less complicated.
Whatever may be the reasons, one thing is for sure: the
modified scheme will help bring the MPs closer to the NGOs.
[References:
'Saansadon ko kshetriya vikas ke liye
milegi jyada raashi', p.1, Dainik Jagran, New Delhi,
17-May-2005
MPLAD: Member of Parliament Local Area
Development Scheme. Under the scheme, each MP is authorised
to commit and spend upto Rs.2 crore
in his/her constituency on various public works and other schemes beneficial
to the constituents.
Rs. 1 crore = Rs. 10
million, ~230,000 US $
Rs. 1 lakh =
Rs.100,000, ~ 2,270 US $
This is based on a news report about a proposal.
It has not yet been implemented.- Ed.]
(13-May-05)
The FCRA Department has recently revamped its web-site.
You can now check the status of your application (for registration or
prior-permission) by visiting the following web-site:
http://mha.nic.in/fcra.htm
Follow the following steps once you reach the site:
·
Click on 'Application Status'.
·
Choose the applicable option.
·
Punch in your file number in the window that
opens up.
You can use this facility only once you receive an
acknowledgement for your application. This acknowledgement letter contains
the file number.
(13-May-05)
This Thursday, the Government has tabled a bill in the
parliament. It is called Taxation Laws (Amendment) Bill 2005. Some of the provisions
may make NGOs' fiscal management more complicated.
According to the news report, the provisions include
the following:
·
Exempt schools and hospitals, with receipts
below Rs. 1 crore, will also need to file income
tax returns.
·
Public trusts with mainly related persons as
trustees may face tougher tax provisions.
·
Rules related to registration and exemption of charities under Income Tax are being
tightened. These may involve deeper scrutiny before registration is granted.
·
Donations above Rupees 20,000 can be accepted
only through account payee cheques or drafts.
·
Audit rules for charities will be tightened.
Please note that these are only proposals in the Bill.
These are not yet law. These will become law only when both Houses pass the
bill, and the President gives his assent.
[References:
'Nakad donation
se pravesh ka khel ab nahin chalega',
p.1, Dainik Jagran, New
Delhi, 13-May-2005
'Anti-tax evasion bill introduced', p.11, Indian
Express, New Delhi, 13-May-05
Rs.20,000 = ~ 460 US $; Rs. 1 crore = Rs.
10 million, ~230,000 US $
Also see AccountAid Capsules 168, 171 and 172
The text of the Bill is not yet available on the
Finance Ministry or Lok Sabha
web-sites.- Ed.]
(11-May-05)
According to a news report, the Finance Minister plans
to 'increase the accountability of charitable organisations'.
A Bill to amend the tax laws will be introduced by Friday. This Bill will
bring funds received by charities under the government scanner.
The Minister has also said that the aim is 'only to
ensure there is a trail of the financial transactions in such organisations
and not any form of harassment.'
Why choose Friday, the 13th, which is traditionally
associated with bad luck?
Well, be thankful that he did not choose Wednesday, the
11th instead, which happens to be Akshay Teej!
[References:
'Funds to charitable bodies to be tracked', p.16,
Hindustan Times, New Delhi, 11-May-2005
Also see AccountAid Capsules 168 and 171
According to the Hindu Lunar calendar, Akshaya Teej falls on 11th May
this year. Anything done this day is considered to be long-lasting and of
great permanence. Which
is why many Indians, particularly in Rajasthan, choose to get married on this
day- Ed.]
(2-May-05)
According to a news-report, there is now another
proposal to amend the FCRA. The objective is to prevent 'massive diversion of
foreign funds by NGOs'.
The latest proposal involves the following changes:
1. Making it mandatory for banks to report on transactions
2. Setting up five regional offices of FCRA to improve
enforcement
3. Review of FCRA registration every five years
According to the Minister of State for Home, Shri Sriprakash Jaiswal, 'the aim is
to ensure that funds are received and used by the right people and is used
for the specified purpose, the changes will not make receiving foreign funds
more difficult.'
No one will disagree with the sentiments of the Honourable Minister. However, FCRA was not designed to
ensure that NGOs use their funds properly. It was designed to ensure that
foreign funds are not used to influence Indian electoral politics. Therefore,
if the Ministry is now getting interested in the proper use of funds by NGOs,
then this is a significant change indeed.
According to the report, the Home Minister, Shri Shivraj Patil has
cleared the proposed changes. A note will be put up to the cabinet soon.
After that, the Parliament is likely to be informed in the current session.
It is said that history repeats itself. There have been
several such
proposals in the past: in 1988, then in 1996, again in 2002 and now in 2005.
None made it to the Parliament. Let us see whether this proposal fares any
better.
[References:
FCRA: Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act,
1976. Applicable in India
'Centre to scan flow of funds to NGOs', p.4,
Indian Express, New Delhi, 1-May-2005]
In a recent judgment, the Supreme Court has ruled that gratuity can not be debited to the salary account.
The application had been moved by Rajasthan Welfare Society, and
several other educational societies. These societies get grant-in-aid from
the Government. They were debiting gratuity to the budget head of salary in
their grant accounts.
The High Court of Rajasthan had ruled against this practice earlier.
Now the Supreme Court has confirmed the judgment.
The Supreme Court has also clarified that it is compulsory for such
societies to pay gratuity under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.
[References:
'Gratuity vetan
ka hissa nahin',
Rajasthan Patrika, New Delhi, 11-April-05
Payment of gratuity is compulsory for NGOs
employing 10 or more persons. - Ed.]
In 2002-03, NGOs and other charitable or religious organisations in India,
received a total of 50.47 arab Rupees as foreign
contribution. This includes money as well as materials.
The biggest donor country, as usual, was USA, with Rs.16.80 arab. It was followed by Germany with Rs.7.15 arab. Next came UK with 6.85 arab Rupees.
Maximum amount of funds were received by organisations registered in
New Delhi: about 8.8 arab Rupees.
According to the Home Ministry, there are about 12 lakh
(1.2 million) NGOs active in India.
[References:
'NGO funds under scanner', Hindustan Times, New
Delhi, 18-Feb-05
'Swayamsevi Sangathanon per kasegi lagaam', Hindustan, Nai Dilli, 18-Feb-05
One arab is equal to
100 crores (one billion or 1000 million).]
If Indian NGOs sometimes feel that the Government does not care for
them, then the Government seems all set to make amends.
The Home Minister chaired a high-powered meeting earlier this month.
The meeting was attended by HRD Minister (Sh. Arjun
Singh), Rural Development Minister (Sh. Raghuvansh
P. Singh), Minister for Social Justice & Empowerment (Su. Meira Kumar), and Minister of Culture (Sh. Jaipal Reddy).
The meeting commended NGOs for their good work. It also felt that some
NGOs need to be more transparent in their working.
What was decided at the meeting? First, that
a national database should be set up on NGOs. Second, that
an expert group should be formed to frame a national policy on NGOs. Third, a
comprehensive legislation on NGOs should be passed.
Curiously, just a month prior to this meeting, the Planning Commission
had organised a consultation to draft a national policy on NGOs. Four expert
groups have also been formed to work on this.
What could be the reason for this seeming overlap? Possibly there is a
mistake in the latest news report.
Or it could be due to the way all good Governments should work: the
left hand knoweth not what the right hand doeth!
In the meanwhile, let's keep our own hands crossed and hope for the
best.
[References:
'NGO funds under scanner', Hindustan Times, New
Delhi, 18-Feb-05
'Swayamsevi Sangathanon per kasegi lagaam', Hindustan, Nai Dilli, 18-Feb-05]
167: Cheques in Drop Boxes
A few years ago, foreign banks in India started a system of drop-boxes
for collecting cheques. Then Indian banks also followed
suit. Some customers have always wondered how safe are
these.
Not very safe, it seems. Delhi Police have arrested two security
guards for stealing cheques from drop-boxes. These
guards, from a private security agency, were posted at the Preet Vihar Branch of Indian
Overseas Bank. They would steal the cheques, erase
the names from the cheque, write their own names and get the cheques encashed. According to
the police, they had encashed at least five such cheques. At the time of their arrest, they were tampering
with a sixth cheque.
According to the newspaper, several such cases have come to light in
recent months.
What can you do about this? One option is to stop using drop-boxes.
Another, more practical solution, is to read AccountAble 9: Banking, and AccountAble
12: Filling Cheques Safely. Both are available at www.AccountAid.net. Both the issues
contain practical tips on how you to protect your cheques
from alteration.
[References:
'Two bank guards arrested for stealing cheques', P.3. Hindustan Times, New Delhi, 4-Feb-05]
In a new twist to their sense of Corporate Social Responsibility, some
corporate groups in Delhi are eyeing charitable hospitals for take-over.
Unfortunately for them, the land allotment rules of DDA do not allow
alienation of land allotted as low prices to charitable institutions.
So what? There is always a way around an inconvenient law. The
corporate groups are now entering into 'management contracts' with the
concerned Trusts. This allows them to run the hospital as they wish,
including raising the fees 4-5 times. The land allotment rules are also not
violated in a technical sense.
Why takeover an existing hospital instead of building a new one? For
several reasons: prime location, existing clientele, infrastructure, staff,
etc.
The first hospital to go corporate is 'Jessa
Ram Hospital' in Karol Bagh, which is now renamed 'Fortis Jessa Ram
Hospital'. Other cases include Devki Devi
Foundation in Saket, and Balaji
Trust in Patparganj, both of whom have entered into
management contracts with Max Healthcare. Mool Chand Khairati Ram Hospital may
also go the same way.
What are the implications for charitable hospitals in general? If this
trend continues, the Government will, sooner or later, be forced to revise
the rules related to tax exemption for charitable hospitals.
Curiously, this trend towards more expensive healthcare is driven by mediclaim insurance. If you are insured you don't really
care how much the treatment costs you. Someone else will be footing the bill.
[References:
DDA: Delhi Development Authority
'Corporates cast net on
hospitals', P.3. Hindustan Times, New Delhi, 31-Jan-05]
FCRA Department has relaxed FCRA provisions for Tsunami relief.
Organisations which do not have FCRA can now accept FCRA funds / materials by
opening a separate bank account. They should designate this account as 'name
of organisation - Tsunami Relief Account'. This account should be used only
for FCRA funds received for Tsunami relief.
They should apply for FCRA permission in form FC-1A within one week of
opening the account. They need not wait for the prior-permission to start
accepting funds or materials.
Intimation of receipt should be sent in form FC-3 by 31st July 2005.
This relaxation is valid only upto
31-March-2005. A copy of the press release and the notification are available
at www.AccountAid.net.
[References:
http://mha.nic.in/Tsunami-I.pdf
http://education.vsnl.com/accountaid/Tsunami_FCRA.htm
|